
Kearny & Broadway
In 2003, The San Francisco Lusty Lady was bought by the entertainers and began to be managed as a worker cooperative. One of two West Coast branches, SF had already entered the news in 1997 when it became the first (and as of today, the only) successfully unionized sex business in the U.S.
Peep shows operate thusly (so I’ve heard): several mostly naked women dance simultaneously on a stage, separated by glass windows from the customers who each stand in their own booth, paying to keep the window open (25 cents/minute). The dancers are also available for 1-on-1 shows in glass separated private booths where tipping is possible. As an added bonus, coin-operated booths showing adult videos are available.
But it’s not all good in the pornographic hood…
Several grievances led to the unionizing effort in 1997. African American feminist Siobhan Brooks (while working at the club) had noticed that dancers were discriminated against and filed a complaint. The precipitating event was the installation of one-way mirrors in the booths, resulting in some customers taking photos and videos of the show.
After a vote of the employees, the business was organized by the Exotic Dancers Union, an affiliate of Service Employees International Union. The Bay Area Sex Worker Advocacy Network (BAYSWAN) provided online support for the workers’ unionization effort, which helped to garner public support for the workers as well as inquiries from other exotic dancers and sex workers throughout the country.
After management cut hourly compensation at the SF Lusty Lady in 2003, the workers struck again and won. The subsequent efforts to turn the club into a worker cooperative were led by Donna Delinqua, a stripper and graduate student.
The workers bought the club for $400,000, with money borrowed from the old owners. In 1996, the club had had a revenue of almost $3 million; by 2003 this had fallen by 40%. The monthly rent was $13,442 in 2003 and had doubled over the preceding three years. The club had a revenue of about $27,000/week in the first half of 2006.
A dispute began in the summer of 2006 when a male employee wrote a confidential email to the co-op board, complaining that hiring of too many heavy women drove customers away, thus lowering every employee’s income.
[text souce: wiki]